Phase V: The Publisher
Phase V: The Publisher
Duration: Weeks 16–17 | Points: 250 Publish your research as a professional web portfolio
Learning Objectives
By the end of Phase V, you will:
- Assemble a complete two-part research report (qualitative + quantitative content analysis)
- Render your report as both a print-ready PDF and a multi-page website
- Manage citations with Zotero and BibTeX
- Deploy your portfolio to GitHub Pages
- Write for multiple audiences (academic, professional, general public)
Phase V Overview
Every assignment this semester has been a building block. The Reading Journals sharpened your thinking. The Librarian Visit Report confirmed your data source. The Prospectus gave you a roadmap. The Codebook gave you a rulebook. The R assignments turned raw codes into tables, charts, and tests. Now you assemble all of it into a single, coherent research report — published simultaneously as a PDF and a live website.
Your final portfolio presents a two-part content analysis:
- Study 1 (Qualitative): How you immersed yourself in the data, identified themes, and developed your coding variables
- Study 2 (Quantitative): Descriptive statistics, visualizations, and an inferential test appropriate to your research questions
Timeline
| Week | Focus | Deliverable |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Ch 21–22: Portfolio & Going Live | CITI Certification; begin assembling final project |
| 16 | Remote Work Week — no class meetings | Build, render, publish |
| 17 | Finals Week | Final Web Portfolio due |
The Final Project
What You Build
A Quarto Book Project that renders to two outputs from the same source files:
- A multi-page website hosted on GitHub Pages
- A print-ready PDF submitted to Blackboard
Project Structure
| File | Content | R Code? |
|---|---|---|
index.qmd |
Abstract + landing page | No |
01-literature-review.qmd |
Background, theory, research questions | No |
02-methodology.qmd |
Two-phase design, data source, variables, pilot | No |
03-study-1.qmd |
Qualitative immersion, themes, variable development | No |
04-study-2.qmd |
Descriptive stats, visualization, inferential test | Yes |
05-discussion.qmd |
Interpretation of both studies, limitations, conclusion | No |
references.qmd |
Auto-generated bibliography | No |
Choosing Your Statistical Test (Study 2)
| Your RQ compares… | Use this test |
|---|---|
| Two categorical variables (e.g., tone x outlet) | Chi-Square |
| One categorical (2 groups) x one continuous (e.g., tone x word count) | T-Test |
| Two continuous variables (e.g., word count x shares) | Correlation |
The starter project includes pre-written R code for all three tests. Keep the one that matches your variables, delete the other two.
Recommended Writing Order
- Methodology — easiest; draws from Codebook and Sampling Plan
- Study 1 — expand your qualitative memo; describe themes and variable development
- Literature Review — expand your Prospectus; add theory from Annotated Manuscript
- Study 2 — place your .RDS file, update variable names, choose your test
- Discussion — interpret both studies; answer the RQs
- Abstract — write last, once everything else exists
Submission
Submit both to Blackboard by Friday, December 19, 2026 at 11:59 pm:
- PDF file — rename to
Lastname_FinalPortfolio.pdf - Live URL — your GitHub Pages link
Both must be present for the submission to be considered complete. Test your URL in a private/incognito browser window before submitting.
Grading Criteria (250 points)
| Criterion | Points |
|---|---|
| Literature Review | 40 |
| Methodology | 40 |
| Study 1 — Qualitative Analysis | 40 |
| Study 2 — Descriptive Statistics | 25 |
| Study 2 — Inferential Test | 35 |
| Discussion & Conclusion | 30 |
| PDF Formatting | 20 |
| GitHub Pages Website | 20 |
| Total | 250 |